From my take ,if I remember correctly, IBM claims they need to cite specific damages in dollar amounts , and if they can't do so than FDUPTA is not applicable ,and by consequence the anti-trust also. So the case should be dismissed.
QSGI has come back again and just stated that the results to the company such as bankruptcy and worthless inventory , they claim the anti-trust practices put them in, are enough to establish FDUPTA.
What did you think was a typo ?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
