InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,222.68
(
0.16%
)
US TECH 100
17,650.00
(
0.05%
)
Dow Jones
39,512.84
(
0.32%
)
Brent Oil
82.38
(
-0.25%
)
Bitcoin
61,353.61
(
0.91%
)
Post# of 74547
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

jaxstraw

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 180
Posts 9202
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 05/01/2009

jaxstraw

Re: ricochet8 post# 73076

Wednesday, 05/16/2012 12:12:41 PM

Wednesday, May 16, 2012 12:12:41 PM

Post# of 74547
From my take ,if I remember correctly, IBM claims they need to cite specific damages in dollar amounts , and if they can't do so than FDUPTA is not applicable ,and by consequence the anti-trust also. So the case should be dismissed.

QSGI has come back again and just stated that the results to the company such as bankruptcy and worthless inventory , they claim the anti-trust practices put them in, are enough to establish FDUPTA.

What did you think was a typo ?




Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up