InvestorsHub Logo

JohnnyWinter

11/01/10 5:58 PM

#247122 RE: diamondguru-one #247002

"The Examiner found no evidence, however, that any suitor would have paid more than $1.88 billion for any select assets of WMB. In any event, the Examiner found no evidence to suggest that the "bad assets" of WMB -- its troubled loan portfolio-- could have been sold separately from the "good assets" at any price. Accordingly, the Examiner concludes there is no factual support for the allegation that the FDIC receiver could have realized more from WMB's assets in a "liquidation". "


(bottom of page 313 and top of page 314 of the report)


The Examiner concludes that there are substantial legal impediments make recovery on a tortious interference agains the FDIC highly unlikely, and, further, the Examiner did not discover FACTS sufficient to form the basis of such a claim."

(page 323 of the report)

http://www.kccllc.net/documents/0812229/0812229101101000000000027.pdf


Also, I suggest that everybody read the entire report, but if you don't have the time, at least read pages 310 through page 328 of the report. (page 327 of the report talks about the call from Bair to Dimon on Sept. 16, 2008 and addresses the "interference claims)


value = ZERO

2 times value = ZERO

2 times value plus = ZERO


tic toc tic toc