InvestorsHub Logo

Huggy Bear

10/12/17 9:23 PM

#53681 RE: janice shell #53680

As I suspected there may indeed be some bankruptcy fraud going on. McCusker states he owns no stock. But we clearly saw differently in the very limited ORRV disclosures post shell hijacking. He couldn't legally have sold this stock under Rule 144.

Then again I see nothing legal here at all so....

Frayed Knot

10/13/17 8:30 AM

#53684 RE: janice shell #53680

It seems to me this new information raises many questions. And as noted, getting answers to those questions seems to me to be very material to ORRV shareholders.

I agree, completely material and important for ORRV shareholders.

Personally, I think it would be important for the Trustee to have this information.

You did an excellent job in clipping all of this together. THANKS.

Frayed Knot

10/13/17 8:35 AM

#53685 RE: janice shell #53680

It may be simplistic but, to me, it sure seems like all McCusker is trying to do is try to get these judgements washed away.

What a slime.

set_pt

10/13/17 8:43 AM

#53688 RE: janice shell #53680

Wow, he willfully perjured both the Federal court and stockholders that own now wothless stock under No name company

The trouble I see here is our Ihub bro day trader now CEO has never mad shareholders aware of any of this information

thanks

what a scam that could have been something

VeronicaFox

10/13/17 9:38 AM

#53697 RE: janice shell #53680

That’s outstanding research, and an excellent layout of the McCusker scam(s). Thank you.

FastEddie01

10/13/17 9:43 AM

#53699 RE: janice shell #53680

It is very difficult to decipher.... for me anyway.

But it appears in one regard that McCusker Holding...no s merged into ORRV along with McCusker Caribbean and McCusker service.

McCusker Holding...no s (NVSOS default corp) owns McCusker & Company inc (NVSOS active) and Service USA inc. (NVSOS dissolved) (I can't find the supporting "ownership" document for this yet except the Feb 27th Annual report)

McCusker Holding...no S did not own McCusker Caribbean or McCusker service. (Assuming) No supporting documents for McCusker Caribbean or McCusker service. merging into ORRV except the BK doc....Funny!!

All that happened on the 201st day of May 2017 (That part is typical in "McCusker world")

The Employee lawsuit was filed July 10, 2017 against McCusker Holding...no S Corp....Which means the "May merger" owns the suit?

The $1,000,000 lawsuit was inherited through the "May Merger" as well....On a bigger note if you look at the "merger documents" it specifically says....No pending lawsuits Article 2- 2.11
https://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=ORRV&id=174538

It all goes back to McCusker Holdings with an S is a existing NVSOS active entity with what assets?

But the "Merger brought McCusker Holding...no S with it.

There is no supporting documents to determine what is "holding" anything?

https://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=ORRV&id=166877
That is, upon closing, McCusker Holding Corp., will merge into a newly created subsidiary of the Issuer, ORRV Acquisition,
Inc.


More profound is this little tidbit here...."ORRV Acquisition" never existed...This was muffed into OORV discussed just the other day with Deagle.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=ORRV&id=173953
Oceanic Research and Recovery "Group" inc. never existed either so what does it all mean in a court of law....absolutely nothing when you break it down!

Without supporting Correction documents, it really turns into a non-merger in my opinion.

Although the Attorney Opinion letter states You have a merger, the word "have" is italicized and bold in the letter.

Once again I think this (have) has substantial meaning in the Attorneys eyes!

I think it's a "Merger" but not what was alleged or intended!

Without supporting documents we are left to assume that "Holdings" is an empty shell that merged with an empty shell and did not bring anything with it..... if all the debt is of "Holding" "personal" and being Bankrupt!

But we can't assume the above if we read the BK document you point out here.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2017/10/12/deurpsale_of_assets_to_ORRV.png

It is the ultimate "Shell game" where we were made to believe all this wonderful stuff merged BUT it was not wonderful and did not Merge!

It all has substantial conflict at every turn!

CrushLikeABoss

10/13/17 10:40 PM

#53742 RE: janice shell #53680

Not surprised at all that Willie had 1 billion shares then he didn't have 1 billion shares...same thing happened with the NTS acquisition, they closed it then they unclosed it. None of it makes sense, just seems to happen in ORRV world!

FastEddie01

01/08/18 2:52 PM

#56781 RE: janice shell #53680

So now that more "Document"s are being produced by "The Company", I've went back and looked at the older things and made some observations that are worth a mention.

I notice in what you have provided as the BK docs, Willy electronically signed the bottom of the "State of affairs" on 10/04/2017 also note he checked a "NO" box here.


He said he sold 3 Entities as you point out in a screen capture.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2017/10/12/deurpsale_of_assets_to_ORRV.png

He also says: "in the last 4 years" he managed some things as a officer/director:


He does not list or mention, Holding, Holdings (s) or Oceanic (ORRV) here? Although the NVSOS shows Willy saying he is "director/officer" of all 3.

He certainly is.... listed as a Board member/officer and Billion share holder in the Public Company docs posted on OTC markets on and before 10/04/2017? It's been pointed out.

According to the Franky Tweet he "was" a Board member/officer up until Nov 29, 2017:


So The "$250,000/20 years" question is: Did or Will the Trustee see these omissions as a problem?

Could this be why he won't show up to the hearings, He has his foot over top of a bear trap?
http://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2017/12/26/sfnskWH_no_show_341.PNG