While the patent may disclose Vitreloy 105 it does not claim it. With the exception of dependent claim 15. However, dependent claim 15 has all of the limitations of claims 1 and 13. So, with respect to this patent only, anyone could use the formula of claim 15 so long as they didn't do the limitations of claims 1 and 13. I believe that it is a misnomer to refer to this patent as the "Vitreloy 105" patent because the formula isn't being claimed.
You keep repeating that, but the clear and unambiguous language of the cross licensing agreement between LQMT and Eontec says the opposite.