Replies to post #25157 on UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[WARHAMMER]

NICE UOIP!

[HokieHead]

Sticky that!!!!

[BCNstocks]

$UOIP added!

Just spoke to attorney representing Chanbond LLC and they are going in for the kill!

Jennifer Ying referred me to Winston and Strawn :) This is going to be awesome

https://www.plainsite.org/dockets/2xk4bxk7m/delaware-district-court/chanbond-llc-v-charter-communications-inc/

[VortMax]

look at this, plain English what is going on here, companies like Time Warner are importing, from overseas, modems, equipment and items, that use the patent that Chanbod has and it all started around 2012.....we are gonna win this suit

https://search.rpxcorp.com/litigation_documents/11539883

The patents-in-suit address and overcome, among other things, the throughput
problems regarding this single channel methodology. The inventors of the patents-in-suit
invented intelligent devices that allow a single data service flow (e.g. large data transmissions) to
be split and modulated onto multiple channels for transmission. This transmission is then
demodulated and recombined back into a single service flow for distribution to addressable
devices. Using the inventions, service providers are now capable of efficiently transmitting more
content at higher speeds and better quality of service.
COUNT I
(INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’822 PATENT)
14. Plaintiff incorporates paragraphs 1 through 13 herein by reference as if set forth
here in full.
15. Upon information and belief, TWC has been and is currently directly infringing,
literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, one or more claims of the ’822 Patent by making,
using, testing, offering to sell, and/or selling within the United States, and/or importing into the
United States, without authority, cable systems and cable services that are covered by at least one
claim of the ’822 Patent. The accused cable systems include cable system components such as
cable modem termination systems, RF transmission hardware, network monitoring equipment
Case 1:15-cv-00852-UNA Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 4
5
and customer premises equipment (e.g., cable modems, embedded multimedia terminal adapters,
and set-top boxes), including but not limited to components that are compliant with the Data
Over Cable System Interface Specification (“DOCSIS”) standard, version 3.0 or higher.1 More
particularly, TWC, without authority from Plaintiff, provides, operates, implements, sells,
markets, imports and/or offers for sale cable systems and/or cable services that perform, are
capable of performing or are provided having channel bonding functionality, including but not
limited to cable systems and components that have the capability to distribute a service flow over
multiple, bonded channels and/or the capability to receive a service flow over multiple, bonded
channels (the “Accused Functionality”). TWC’s cable systems and components that perform or
are capable of performing the accused functionality, and/or the use of such cable systems and
components, infringe one or more claims of the ’822 Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271.
16. As a result of TWC’s unlawful infringement of the ’822 Patent, Plaintiff has
suffered and will continue to suffer damages in an amount to be proven at trial. Plaintiff is
entitled to recover from TWC the damages adequate to compensate for such infringement, which
have yet to be determined.
17. TWC will continue to infringe the ’822 Patent unless and until it is enjoined by
this Court.

[the_little_farmer]

What is happening here, am i late to buy 5 M ;)

[faqt]

Winston & Strawn represents Cisco, Turner, Charter, Comcast, etc... They do not represent UOIP

Bolded below are UOIP's lawyers (Plaintiff)

www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions/rga/2016/december/15-842.pdf

Stephen B. Brauerman, Esq., BAYARD, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Sara E. Bussier, Esq., BAY ARD, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Mark S. Raskin, Esq., MISHCON DE REYA NEW YORK LLP, New York, NY; Robert A. Whitman, Esq., MISHCON DE REYA NEW YORK LLP, New York, NY; Michael S. DeVincenzo, Esq. (argued), MISHCON DE REYA NEW YORK LLP, New York, NY; John F. Petrsoric, Esq. (argued), MISHCON DE REYA NEW YORK LLP, New York, NY.
Attorneys for Plaintiff

Jack B. Blumenfeld, Esq., MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jennifer Ying, Esq., MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael Brody, Esq. (argued), WINSTON & STRAWN LLP, Chicago, IL; Jonathan Retsky, Esq., WINSTON & STRAWN LLP, Chicago, IL; Krishnan Padmanabhan, Esq. (argued), WINSTON & STRAWN LLP, New York, NY; Anup Misra, Esq., WINSTON & STRAWN LLP, New York, NY; Alexandra McTague, Esq., WINSTON & STRAWN LLP, Menlo Park, CA; James Lin, Esq., WINSTON & STRAWN LLP, Menlo Park, CA;
Attorneys for Defendants

Long UOIP

[VortMax]

Filed: 2/11/2016, Entered: None
Amended Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent UnifiedOnline, Inc. for ChanBond, LLC, ChanBond, LLC, ChanBond, LLC, ChanBond, LLC, ChanBond, LLC, ChanBond, LLC, ChanBond, LLC, ChanBond, LLC, ChanBond, LLC, ChanBond, LLC, ChanBond, LLC, ChanBond, LLC, ChanBond, LLC filed by ChanBond, LLC. (Bussiere, Sara) (Entered: 02/11/2016)

[KeepItRealistic]

Beware ...

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/UOIP/quote

OTC Markets Group Inc. (“OTC Markets”) has discontinued the display of quotes on www.otcmarkets.com for this security because it has been labeled Caveat Emptor (Buyer Beware) for one of the following reasons:

Promotion/Spam without Adequate Current Information — The security is being promoted to the public, but adequate current information about the company has not been made available to the public. Promotional activities may include spam email, unsolicited faxes or news releases, whether published by the company or a third party.

Investigation of Fraud or Other Criminal Activities — There is an investigation or other indication of fraudulent or other criminal activity involving the company, its securities or insiders.

Suspension/Halt — A regulatory authority or an exchange has halted or suspended trading for public interest concerns (i.e. not a news or earnings halt).

Undisclosed Corporate Actions — The security or company is the subject of a corporate action, such as a reverse merger, stock split, or name change, without adequate current information being publicly available.
Unsolicited Quotes — The security has only been quoted on an unsolicited basis since it entered the public markets and the company has not made adequate current information available to the public.
Other Public Interest Concern — OTC Markets Group may determine that there is a public interest concern regarding the security. Such concerns may include but are not limited to promotion, spam or disruptive corporate actions even when adequate current information is available.

OTC Markets will resume the display of this security’s quotes once adequate current information is made available by the issuer pursuant to the Alternative Reporting Standard or by the SEC Reporting Standard, and until OTC Markets believes there is no longer a public interest concern. Investors are encouraged to use caution and due diligence in their investment decisions. Please read our Investor Protection page and OTC Markets Policy Regarding Caveat Emptor for more information.

[KeepItRealistic]

This company has a history of RS's

Security Notes
Capital Change=shs increased by 10 for 1 split. Ex-date=10/13/2004. Rec date=09/30/2004. Pay date=10/12/2004.
Capital Change=shs decreased by 1 for 10 split. Pay date=01/07/2002.
Capital Change=6-74 shs decreased by 1 for 3 reverse split
New Issue=8-69 150,000 shs in units (1 sh Com & 1 warr) at $3 per unit by Charles Plohn & Co. Warrants entitle holder to purchase Com at $4 to 8-18-71.
Capital Change=shs decreased by 1 for 80 split Pay date=04/27/2005.
Capital Change=shs decreased by 1 for 400 split. Ex-date=01/05/2015.

[KeepItRealistic]

Getting nowhere after 2.5 years ...

Billion dollar companies will drag this out for many more years before paying a dime.


Legal Document (Payment Possibly Required) 1 Filed: 9/21/2015, Entered: None
COMPLAINT for PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Charter Communications, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-1791215.) - filed by ChanBond, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet)(nmb) (Entered: 09/22/2015)

[KeepItRealistic]

Last entry, shows no progress
Moving at a crawl pace as expected


Legal Document (Payment Possibly Required) 25 Filed: 2/23/2016, Entered: None
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME To submit a proposed protective order to March 3, 2016 - filed by ChanBond, LLC. (Brauerman, Stephen) (Entered: 02/23/2016)
Request RequestSpace

[KeepItRealistic]

Attorney giving case information to an investor lmfao

This attorney should be disbarred

[abazaba375]

Why hasn't a big firm taken on the case to speed things up if this is truly a lock