InvestorsHub Logo

RDY2ROCK

04/21/17 8:50 AM

#157027 RE: ZPaul #157025

OUTSTANDING 5 STAR POST and Thank you ZPaul! ;-)

MODs this deserves a sticky post!

$SFOR STRONG!

Jtech

04/21/17 8:52 AM

#157028 RE: ZPaul #157025

ahhh much better!

abazaba375

04/21/17 8:53 AM

#157029 RE: ZPaul #157025

Amazing post here some technicals to back it up very very bullish reset here

Pay attention to volume this is the biggest volume week since 4 weeks prior to the Microsoft settlement get the HINT;)

Gap to fill 50 Dma break on 30 min

The full sto is lower then it was and lunching when we were at .008

Looks very good I'm gonna have to try and get those .0153 on the bid at open lol

ZPaul

04/21/17 9:00 AM

#157031 RE: ZPaul #157025

1st Slide's Last Tick Point is CYGATE, New Enterprise Class Security Product with Industry's only encrypted MFA/OOBA That SFOR/ACS is working with PCI Directly i.e. https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/ for PCI Compliance

https://www.advancedcybersecurity.com/cygate%E2%84%A2.html


Lolaspike

04/21/17 10:59 AM

#157096 RE: ZPaul #157025

Thank you...I was having nightmares that you left the message board.

Good Stuff! So undervalued IMO.

I_Am_Ram

04/29/17 2:40 AM

#159138 RE: ZPaul #157025

I just read through all of this again. Basically SFOR is relying on another company to survive. The "9 major catalysts" are either not panning out or probably not going to happen before we see SFORQ. The only thing in there to say that is not true is an email from Kay saying money will be there, don't worry. So he's somehow going to get more debt OR dilute or R/S. It's the reality of things. It's the world of the sharks. Sharks don't care about the fish until its feeding time.

Hopefully ACS's sales go up 40,000% so the royalties will be enough to stop the bleeding long enough for one of these lawsuits to finish up. Otherwise, this is 5-6 weeks away from feeding time.

Sidney0326

05/05/17 9:39 AM

#160905 RE: ZPaul #157025

Just reading up on IPR's:
smithhopen.com


..... like this part


Retaining an IPR counsel in anticipation of an IPR petition will ensure that the IPR counsel has sufficient time to thoroughly analyze the patent, its prosecution history, and the closest known prior art. This strategy will maximize the chances for the dismissal of the IPR petition, which would yield substantial savings in time and money and would provide immense leverage in settlement negotiations. Although IPRs generally favor the petitioners, a well-prepared patent owner represented by strong IPR counsel can turn the odds in its favor.

Pennydream

05/05/17 10:31 PM

#161068 RE: ZPaul #157025

NOT sfor webinar ! Misdirection of dd