Replies to post #205812 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[obiterdictum]

US COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

The discovery schedule and its details for the Fairholme case is found in this document:
http://www.valueplays.net/wp-content/uploads/Fairholme-Discovery-Schedule.pdf

Location and status conference info is found in this document
http://timhoward717.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/4914-orderconferences.pdf
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

The Plaintiffs and Defendants have suggested that the original dates for pre-trial proceedings (briefing schedule) be extended by 30 days for several reasons that can be found in the document below.

http://www.plainsite.org/dockets/download.html?id=132219507&z=7d558a18 - Downloads file

The schedule, if accepted, will look like what is below.

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE IN ALL CASES

THEREFORE, the parties jointly stipulate to extend the briefing schedule by 30 days, and respectfully request that the Court adopt a briefing schedule as follows:

1. Plaintiffs file oppositions to defendants’ motions and cross-motions and motion for judicial notice
March 21, 2014

2. Defendants file replies in support of their motions and oppositions to plaintiffs’ cross-motions and reply in support of their motion for judicial notice
May 2, 2014

3. Plaintiffs file replies in support of their cross-motions
June 2, 2014

4. Hearing on defendants’ dispositive motions and plaintiffs’ cross-motions
June 23, 2014, at 9:30 a.m.

This new suggested schedule, as far as I know, has not been ordered by Judge Royce Lamberth