SureTrader Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement
Home > Boards > US Listed > Computers - Semiconductors > Intel (INTC)

First A7 Die Shot

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (2) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
wbmw Member Profile
Member Level 
Followed By 28
Posts 26,118
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/11/02
160x600 placeholder
Apple Ranks Near Last on This Measure "The Motley Fool" - 11/30/2015 1:40:27 PM
Why Apple Inc.’s 2016 MacBook Will Use an Intel Corp. Core M Processor "The Motley Fool" - 11/30/2015 11:00:03 AM
Qualcomm Inc. vs. Intel Corporation: Which Will Win in the Internet of Things? "The Motley Fool" - 11/27/2015 5:00:08 PM
Inside Intel Corp.’s Strategy to Grow PC-Related Revenue "The Motley Fool" - 11/27/2015 11:30:02 AM
How Intel Spent $56 Billion in 12 Months "The Motley Fool" - 11/27/2015 9:22:44 AM
Intel Corporation Dividend Hike: A Stroke of Genius, or Just Show? "The Motley Fool" - 11/26/2015 5:00:04 PM
How Intel Corp. Might Be Coping With High-End Skylake Processor Shortages "The Motley Fool" - 11/26/2015 9:35:03 AM
Give Thanks: These Stocks Just Raised Their Dividends "The Motley Fool" - 11/26/2015 7:00:03 AM
How Intel Corp. Is Shuffling Around Its Spending "The Motley Fool" - 11/25/2015 5:35:02 PM
What Will It Take for Intel Corp.’s Mobile Group to Reach Profitability? "The Motley Fool" - 11/25/2015 3:35:03 PM
How Poor 14-Nanometer Yields Have Impacted Intel Corp.'s Product Costs "The Motley Fool" - 11/25/2015 9:35:03 AM
IBM vs. Intel Corporation: The Data Center Battle Escalates "The Motley Fool" - 11/24/2015 9:04:02 PM
Intel Corp. Reportedly Trying to Play Fab for LG "The Motley Fool" - 11/24/2015 1:35:02 PM
Qualcomm, Inc. Isn't Going to Make It Easy for Intel Corp. to Win the iPhone 7s "The Motley Fool" - 11/24/2015 10:35:02 AM
Qualcomm Inc and IBM Love This Company, but Should You? "The Motley Fool" - 11/24/2015 9:15:03 AM
Intel Corporation and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. Team Up in the Internet of Things "The Motley Fool" - 11/23/2015 7:00:03 PM
Intel Corp. to Improve Mobile Profitability by $800 Million in 2016 "The Motley Fool" - 11/23/2015 3:35:03 PM
Here’s How Intel Corp.’s Data Center Chief Views Potential Competitive Threats "The Motley Fool" - 11/23/2015 10:35:02 AM
Can Business Users Reverse Tablet Sales Trends? "The Motley Fool" - 11/22/2015 7:00:03 PM
Photo of Intel CEO Brian Krzanich Playing a Charity League of Legends Match Against Texas Technology Billionaire Mark Cuban a... "Business Wire" - 11/21/2015 8:21:00 PM
Understanding Intel Corp.'s Growth Strategy "The Motley Fool" - 11/21/2015 9:30:08 AM
Intel Taps Rival For Chip Talent "Dow Jones News" - 11/21/2015 3:02:00 AM
Intel Selects Qualcomm Executive for New Senior Job "Dow Jones News" - 11/20/2015 4:50:00 PM
Intel Selects Qualcomm Executive for New Senior Job "Dow Jones News" - 11/20/2015 4:40:00 PM
3 Things That Intel Corp. Management Wants You to Know About Its Data Center Business "The Motley Fool" - 11/20/2015 3:35:02 PM
wbmw Member Level  Sunday, 09/22/13 12:53:21 PM
Re: This Causes an Error post# 122897
Post # of 143199 
First A7 Die Shot

Below are A7 (28nm), then A6 (32nm), then Bay Trail (22nm) for comparison. I did some quick measurements in mspaint, for those who are interested. All sizes are normalized to 22nm. Conversion is 0.7^2 for 32nm-->22nm, and 0.9^2 for 32nm-->28nm. The CPU includes all the cores and all the cache, while the GPU includes all of the regular arrays that can be seen in the die shot, but probably misses fixed function media, etc, which are likely in other areas around the primary graphics arrays.

Die size of Bay Trail is in the datasheet (102mm2), last page, if you zoom in on coordinates C1 (9.723mm) and C2 (10.477mm).

Die Size CPU Size Normalized GPU Size Normalized

A7 102mm2 17.8mm2 10.77mm2 23.2mm2 14.0mm2
A6 97mm2 15.2mm2 7.45mm2 20.4mm2 10.0mm2
Bay Trail 102mm2 17.1mm2 17.10mm2 18.6mm2 18.6mm2

- Given that Bay Trail has 2x as many cores, I can understand how normalized CPU area ended up 60% larger than A7. Still, with performance less than 60% faster, Apple clearly has better perf/area efficiency.

- The normalized GPU area does suggest that Bay Trail's graphics are also less efficient, but part of that does include the significant overhead to enable DX11 (and from what I recall, Imagination 6-series does not). This is important under Windows, but does not currently get used under iOS. However, Android will eventually support OpenGL-ES 3.0, which will probably use the same functional transistors, and so Intel will likely be able to support those features, and overall improved graphics rendering quality.

Overall, it does appear that Apple achieved both a very high performance design, as well as a fairly area efficient design. You can also see that the normalized growth over A6 (44% on CPU and 40% on GPU) is pretty nominal, given the generational performance increase. Performance per area has gone up dramatically, and given the half-process shrink to 28nm, was nearly washed out.

Intel will need to step up their game. While I think Bay Trail will still win in the Android and Windows ecosystems, I'm hoping the 14nm generation products get the improvements in density needed to be the market leader.

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (2) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
Current Price
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist