Your point is true but totally irrelevant!
My point (about YOUR post of a quote you attribute to Dr. Kaplan) is that IF your post of it was ACCURATE then a search would have revealed the original posting of it if that was not by you.
Since a search reveals ONLY your posts and posts that are quotes of your posts, either your quote was not accurate (i.e.: contained some inaccuracy that caused a search to fail to find it) or you were the source. My point stands: we have ONLY your word for it.
The Post from St cal. you link to means nothing. It makes a comment that only makes sense when you read exactly what it is referring to (i.e.: "what Manshoon posted" (what you posted WHEN?, you've done thousands of posts and what EXACTLY was said in those posts.) but there is no practical way of finding what it does refer to. (and no, I'm not about to go thru thousands of posts. YOU make the claim, it's up to YOU to back it up!)
IMHO you might benefit greatly from a little scientific training because that teaches a great deal about standards of evidence (i.e.: that it actually supports what you say it does, that links and references go to the actual source you are referring to rather than something else quoting that source, etc)
EVIDENCE is something that in and of itself supports (or refutes) a claim. A reference that hearsay exists, that does not even say exactly what the hearsay is, is very clearly not evidence.
Once again: WE DO NOT KNOW. You may THINK you know, but if you have EVIDENCE to support your belief you have failed to show it. Considering my opinion of your past record I am unable to just take your word for it.
