Mobilepro Corp (fka MOBL)

[harr449]

MOBL ...revoke the registration of each class of registered securities of Respondents.


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 66693/ March 30, 2012

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-14767
________________________________________

In the Matter of :
:
JETRONIC INDUSTRIES, INC. (n/k/a NEW : ORDER MAKING FINDINGS AND
BASTION DEVELOPMENT, INC.), : REVOKING REGISTRATIONS BY
LIONS PETROLEUM, INC. (n/k/a CHINA : DEFAULT AS TO THREE
HONGXING AGRITECH, INC.), : RESPONDENTS
MDI, INC., and :
MOBILEPRO CORP. :
________________________________________

The Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) instituted this proceeding with an Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings (OIP) on February 23, 2012, pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). The OIP alleges that Lions
Petroleum, Inc. (n/k/a China Hongxing Agritech, Inc.) (Lions Petroleum), MDI, Inc. (MDI), and MobilePro Corp. (MobilePro) (collectively, Respondents) have repeatedly failed to file timely periodic reports with the Commission, in violation of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder.1

The Office of the Secretary and the Division of Enforcement have provided evidence that Respondents were served with the OIP by February 27, 2012. See 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.141(a)(2)(ii), (iv). To date, Respondents have not filed Answers, which were due by March
12, 2012. OIP at 3; 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.160, .220(b). On March 13, 2012, Respondents were
ordered to show cause, by March 22, 2012, why the registrations of their securities should not be revoked by default. A telephonic prehearing conference was held on March 22, 2012, at which Respondents did not appear.

Respondents are in default for failing to file Answers, appear at the prehearing
conference, or otherwise defend the proceeding. 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155(a), .220(f), .221(f).
Accordingly, as authorized by Rule 155(a) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, I find the
following allegations in the OIP to be true.

1 Jetronic Industries, Inc. (n/k/a New Bastion Development, Inc.), filed its Answer on March 19,

2012, and remains in the proceeding.

Lions Petroleum (CIK No. 1048407) is a void Delaware corporation located in Harbin,
Heilongjiang Province, China, with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant
to Exchange Act Section 12(g). Lions Petroleum is delinquent in its periodic filings with the
Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 31, 2007, which reported a net loss of $119,137 for the prior three months. As
of February 14, 2012, the company’s stock (symbol “LPET”) was quoted on OTC Link, had
eight market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule
15c2-11(f)(3).

MDI (CIK No. 318259) is a void Delaware corporation located in San Antonio, Texas,
with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Exchange Act Section
12(g). MDI is delinquent in its periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any
periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009. As of
February 14, 2012, the company’s stock (symbol “MDIZQ”) was quoted on OTC Link, had eight
market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-
11(f)(3).

MobilePro (CIK No. 769592) is a Delaware corporation located in Gaithersburg,
Maryland, with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Exchange Act
Section 12(g). MobilePro is delinquent in its periodic filings with the Commission, having not
filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2009, which
reported an operating loss of over $10.6 million for the prior twelve months. As of February 14,
2012, the company’s stock (symbol “MOBL”) was quoted on OTC Link, had ten market makers,
and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3).

In addition to repeated failures to file timely periodic reports, Respondents have failed to
heed delinquency letters sent to them by the Division of Corporation Finance requesting
compliance with their periodic filing obligations or, through their failure to maintain a valid
address on file with the Commission as required by Commission rules, did not receive such
letters.

Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder require issuers
of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act to file with the Commission
current and accurate information in periodic reports, even if the registration is voluntary under
Section 12(g). Specifically, Rule 13a-1 requires issuers to file annual reports, and Rule 13a-13
requires domestic issuers to file quarterly reports. 17 C.F.R. §§ 240.13a-1, -13.

As a result of the foregoing, Respondents have failed to comply with Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13a-1 and 13a-13 thereunder. Considering these delinquencies, it is necessary and appropriate for the protection of investors to revoke the registration of each class
of registered securities of Respondents.

2