InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 774
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/27/2011

Re: None

Saturday, 03/10/2012 6:03:51 PM

Saturday, March 10, 2012 6:03:51 PM

Post# of 92768
What we should keep in mind is that the Air Force contract is chump change. Its real value is in the implications of the Air Force ordering a contract in the first place, and there is a lot of value there. AlumiFuel's technology is useful to somebody, and that leads me to two conclusions.

Someone (Lockheed Martin, Air Force?) have a vested interest in AlumiFuel's technology, and want to acquire it for themselves. Therefore,

1.- They have a vested interest in saving the company from the huge debt it's accrued, thus big, good things may be coming.

Or, 2.- They have a vested interest in the technology, and not the company itself, and may want it to fail to scoop up the patents and technology for cheap, leaving shareholders screwed.

Which one seems more plausible?