InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 221
Posts 28613
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/18/2009

Re: BigBake1 post# 25826

Sunday, 07/10/2011 5:50:35 PM

Sunday, July 10, 2011 5:50:35 PM

Post# of 37484
Bake1, if the transaction never occurred, BEHL is guilty and needs to return the shares. But if you mention that "they completed the transaction with Texas Oil using Bonds for them" and that BNPD or TXOM "They don't care where the shares are" would be an oxymoron.

First of all, you do not use bonds. This is not like issuing debt or buying treasury "bonds".

The Company cancels said shares and "bonds" the TA from liability on lost certificates. Basically an insurance policy from liability on the TA that the Company accepts responsibility on the canceled but lost certificates and any legal action that may come with it.

With BEHL's failure to provide appropriate consideration for the pilfered shares, as per your innuendo, has "bonded" the TA from liability to said lost/pilfered shares and has canceled them.

This means that in light of the aforementioned quote in my first paragraph, that BNPD and TXOM management Do care where these shares are and are remedying this situation.