SureTrader Stock Hero Advertisement
Home > Boards > US Listed > Computers - Semiconductors > Intel (INTC)

The core power cost of x86 over RISC

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
chipguy Member Profile
 
Followed By 20
Posts 14,582
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/17/03
160x600 placeholder
Advertisement
Explaining Intel Corporation's Capital Expenditure Cuts "The Motley Fool" - 4/18/2015 1:00:03 PM
Semiconductor Startups Face the Flip Side of Moore's Law "Dow Jones News" - 4/17/2015 6:44:11 PM
Advanced Micro Devices Inc. Pulls the Plug on SeaMicro "The Motley Fool" - 4/17/2015 3:00:03 PM
Moore's Law Runs Out of Gas "Dow Jones News" - 4/17/2015 11:36:02 AM
Best Investment Pure Play in the Internet of Things "The Motley Fool" - 4/17/2015 11:17:02 AM
How to Build a Portfolio of Tech Stocks "The Motley Fool" - 4/17/2015 9:22:02 AM
Intel Upgraded to "Buy" by Tigress Financial (INTC) "Analyst Ratings Network" - 4/17/2015 6:39:36 AM
2 Server Companies to Invest in Now "The Motley Fool" - 4/16/2015 7:04:02 PM
Apple Inc. Becomes Samsung Group's Biggest Customer "The Motley Fool" - 4/16/2015 6:00:03 PM
What Apple Inc's Purchase of LinX Means For New iPhones and iPads "The Motley Fool" - 4/16/2015 5:20:03 PM
Here's How Intel Corporation's PC Chip Sales Could Rebound This Year "The Motley Fool" - 4/16/2015 3:00:04 PM
10 Largest Companies by Market Cap in Mobile "The Motley Fool" - 4/16/2015 10:15:15 AM
Intel Upgraded by Sanford C. Bernstein to "Market Perform" (INTC) "Analyst Ratings Network" - 4/16/2015 3:31:05 AM
Why Intel Corporation’s Airmont Looks Well Suited for a Future Atom x3 Chip "The Motley Fool" - 4/15/2015 8:00:03 PM
Intel Stock Rating Reaffirmed by Barclays (INTC) "Analyst Ratings Network" - 4/15/2015 6:43:30 PM
Intel Earns "Market Perform" Rating from Oppenheimer (INTC) "Analyst Ratings Network" - 4/15/2015 6:43:29 PM
Intel Given a $40.00 Price Target at FBR & Co. (INTC) "Analyst Ratings Network" - 4/15/2015 6:36:41 PM
Intel Stock Rating Reaffirmed by FBR & Co. (INTC) "Analyst Ratings Network" - 4/15/2015 6:23:57 PM
Reiterates $40 Rating for Intel (INTC) "Analyst Ratings Network" - 4/15/2015 6:23:55 PM
Intel's $33 Rating Reaffirmed at (INTC) "Analyst Ratings Network" - 4/15/2015 6:23:52 PM
Reaffirms Nomura Rating for Intel (INTC) "Analyst Ratings Network" - 4/15/2015 6:23:51 PM
Intel Earns $37 Rating from (INTC) "Analyst Ratings Network" - 4/15/2015 6:23:49 PM
Intel Receives Barclays Rating from (INTC) "Analyst Ratings Network" - 4/15/2015 6:23:46 PM
Intel Given " $40 " Rating at (INTC) "Analyst Ratings Network" - 4/15/2015 6:23:41 PM
Intel Given $37 Rating at (INTC) "Analyst Ratings Network" - 4/15/2015 6:23:38 PM
chipguy   Wednesday, 05/18/11 01:34:24 AM
Re: DavidA2 post# 101614
Post # of 140374 
The core power cost of x86 over RISC depends on issue width,
pipeline depth, and in-order vs OOOE. The front end decoder
complexity goes up with the square of issue width for x86 vs
roughly linear for RISC. OOOE is also more complex for x86
than RISC. For something like C2D/Nehalem/SB x86 probably
adds 25-30% in power over an equivalent RISC. For something
like Atom it probably adds 15-20% in power over an equivalent
RISC.

Now keep in mind for a 1W phone SoC the CPU core accounts
for 300-400 mW. So x86 adds 45 - 80 mW in full active power
when EVERYTHING ELSE IS EQUAL. Please note the qualifier.
It is generally not true. In fact it is so not true that despite all
its baggage x86 accounts for over 90 cents out of every dollar
spent in the world on microprocessors of all size, description,
and use.

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
X
Current Price
Change
Volume
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist