SureTrader SureTrader
Home > Boards > US Listed > Computers - Semiconductors > Intel (INTC)

The core power cost of x86 over RISC

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
chipguy Member Profile
 
Followed By 20
Posts 14,607
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/17/03
160x600 placeholder
Advertisement
Intel Corporation’s Deal With Spreadtrum Just Got Weird "The Motley Fool" - 5/27/2015 12:41:44 PM
Current Report Filing (8-k) "Edgar (US Regulatory)" - 5/27/2015 6:01:27 AM
3 Dow Stocks Hiding Weak Growth Prospects With Share Buybacks "The Motley Fool" - 5/26/2015 7:15:02 PM
Intel Corporation's Purley Server Platform Looks Like a Beast "The Motley Fool" - 5/26/2015 4:04:02 PM
Google Inc. Could Reveal an "Internet of Things" OS Soon "The Motley Fool" - 5/26/2015 3:20:02 PM
Will Intel Corporation's Skylake Allow Apple Inc. to Cut the Discrete GPU Out of the MacBook? "The Motley Fool" - 5/26/2015 1:00:03 PM
Is Intel Corporation Going to Power the Samsung Galaxy Tab S2? "The Motley Fool" - 5/24/2015 12:25:03 PM
The Bear Case for Wearable Health Technology "The Motley Fool" - 5/24/2015 8:10:02 AM
5 Things Cisco Systems, Inc's Management Wants You to Know "The Motley Fool" - 5/22/2015 2:04:10 PM
Intel Headquarters Building Topped With Wind Turbines "Business Wire" - 5/21/2015 7:22:00 PM
Samsung Electronics Aggressively Expands Into the Internet of Things "The Motley Fool" - 5/21/2015 9:02:03 AM
Specialized Disclosure Report (sd) "Edgar (US Regulatory)" - 5/21/2015 8:52:36 AM
Intel Corporation’s Skylake Launch Schedule Revealed "The Motley Fool" - 5/21/2015 8:40:02 AM
3 Undervalued Stocks in Tech Worth Buying "The Motley Fool" - 5/21/2015 8:21:02 AM
Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) "Edgar (US Regulatory)" - 5/20/2015 5:07:08 PM
Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) "Edgar (US Regulatory)" - 5/20/2015 5:05:48 PM
What Is the S&P 500 Index? "The Motley Fool" - 5/20/2015 12:15:10 PM
More Than Just Talk: Cisco Systems Inc. and Intel Corporation Leverage the Internet of Things In-Hou "The Motley Fool" - 5/20/2015 11:03:02 AM
Can Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Be Saved By Augmented and Virtual Reality? "The Motley Fool" - 5/20/2015 10:40:03 AM
Apple Inc. Skips Over Intel Corp’s Broadwell for the 15-inch Retina MacBook Pro "The Motley Fool" - 5/19/2015 5:57:04 PM
Microsoft Corporation Gains a Key Ally for Windows Phone, but Will Others Follow? "The Motley Fool" - 5/19/2015 5:00:02 PM
Why Apple Inc. Won’t Buy NVIDIA Corporation’s Icera "The Motley Fool" - 5/19/2015 3:00:02 PM
Intel Corporation and Altera Corporation Resume Acquisition Talks "The Motley Fool" - 5/19/2015 2:28:02 PM
Apple Inc. Reportedly Refreshing Mac Lineup This Week "The Motley Fool" - 5/19/2015 8:20:11 AM
The 30 Dow Jones Stocks "The Motley Fool" - 5/18/2015 9:09:03 PM
chipguy   Wednesday, 05/18/11 01:34:24 AM
Re: DavidA2 post# 101614
Post # of 141032 
The core power cost of x86 over RISC depends on issue width,
pipeline depth, and in-order vs OOOE. The front end decoder
complexity goes up with the square of issue width for x86 vs
roughly linear for RISC. OOOE is also more complex for x86
than RISC. For something like C2D/Nehalem/SB x86 probably
adds 25-30% in power over an equivalent RISC. For something
like Atom it probably adds 15-20% in power over an equivalent
RISC.

Now keep in mind for a 1W phone SoC the CPU core accounts
for 300-400 mW. So x86 adds 45 - 80 mW in full active power
when EVERYTHING ELSE IS EQUAL. Please note the qualifier.
It is generally not true. In fact it is so not true that despite all
its baggage x86 accounts for over 90 cents out of every dollar
spent in the world on microprocessors of all size, description,
and use.

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
X
Current Price
Change
Volume
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist