I have read and followed this board for quite some months now. What to this point is most interesting about the shareholders of QASP is the common thread of discontent amongst the masses. The ultimate reality of it all is why ?
Why did shareholders allow themselves to be suckered into questionable PR’s. Who in there right minds would fall for such spin doctor tales on wild gain and mass fortune in such a small period of time. Whether you want to except it or not, but all of you have a part to play in all of this.
Why did you as shareholders hold on to worthless stock that were assumed on a one day big payout?
Why did you as shareholders limit your voice to this IHUB message board and not request Dean's removal early on ?
You can point fingers all you want and you can make me out and others to be your escape goat, and the reason for your frustrations. As it was so eloquently put by one shareholders WAH WHAH WAH (to suggest that I am crying) well what do you all think you have been doing for months on end. Common sense would have alerted someone here to call a special shareholders meeting in order to cure the problem (Dean Bradley) but no one did.
Instead what you do is demonize a newcomers effort that had your best interest at hand. Yeah so what I mentioned on the CC that an A/S increase was a form of a necessary evil to resurrect Quasar, common shares are the only existing thing of real value this company has to it’s credit. No one and I repeat no one has been willing to bring any real revenue into this company to help it out.
Regardless of what you think about me or my comments, the bottom line here is that you as shareholders have shelled out a lot of money and in exchange you have worthless stock in return.
The necessary evil will still have to be addressed, and there will be no way to sugar coat or dance around what will ultimately have to done in order to restore value into this cesspool of a mess created.
Any form of investing is a risk and sometimes the reward out weighs the risk, but any educated investor knows that penny stock investing comes with certain failure to the tune of 98%. So, before it is assumed that I am defending Dean Bradley, think again and if you think I am bashing Jeff D you are sadly mistaken. When I met both individuals I was a neutral party my role has been very simple and that was to introduce the company to possible investor that would be interested in taking on this mess. I, thank GOD and I have told this to James on many occasions that he came in with the interest to take on this task because no one up this point had any interest.
With that being said, you must remember you are still far from out of the woods yet, and people like myself will still be working behind the scenes to accomplish the proposed theories into reality so that you as shareholders can truly benefit. So, say what you want and insult me all you like whether you like it or not my opinion(s) still carry weight. Oh, and by the way the ring that you guys like to joke abut was worth 27,500k (one shareholder used $80.00 to devalue me as a credible person), and to the other how is my grammar (LOL). The point of the matter is that you have people like me cheering for the underdog which is you as shareholders , do not destroy the one thing you have going for by totally dismissing ones opinion. Look at it like this:
There is no one solution that will totally cure the situation without you having to lose another limb or two. Your investment into a pipe dream is to far gone for that. “I see this way if I had to amputate both your legs so that you could live then I would rather see that you have a quality of life in a wheel chair than suffer in the current condition.
AI
