Teva’s Bill Marth may be in spin mode again vis-à-vis the Copaxone litigation. Marth said on today’s webcast that, following the judge’s denial of a summary judgment based on indefiniteness, there are no longer any differences in claims construction between Teva’s interpretation and NVS/MNTA’s interpretation. However, the table in the fourth linked document of #msg-54150823 includes differences in the parties’ interpretations of terms other than those relating to molecular weight, which the judge has not yet ruled on, as far as I know.
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated in any area of human knowledge!”
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.