InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5218
Posts 24047
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 09/20/2000

Re: Argyll post# 4829

Saturday, 01/31/2009 11:37:43 PM

Saturday, January 31, 2009 11:37:43 PM

Post# of 7503
Argyll, to add...

Generally speaking, a company wants to pay salaries and expenses from the Revenues generated from the company. If the company was only generating but so much Revenue at such time as the $135,068 for the year ended 7-31-08 as you mentioned, then the only options are to not pay anything or to simply offer using shares to pay the salaries. I guess he could have taken money out of the $125 million that he sold his private company for to pay salaries and expenses, but that would not have been right considering the reason for existing as a public entity.

From some DD that I have previously done privately and publicly, I don't think that they have any more money issues. I will call the company to verify just to see what they say, but I am humbly asking that you also call the company too and ask some of these questions to see if what we get is consistent.

I really do think that something major is about to be released here in the next couple of weeks or so or less (give or take). Only a guess.

By all means, I am very new to CINT so I don’t want to seem like I’m defending the company dilution trend that had transpired in the past, but I do think that any dilution that happened in the past is just that… in the past. I think CINT will transform to be an investment and not a trade. IMHO

v/r
Sterling

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.