that's not at all what i or others are asking. You allow people to call CEO names, call them cheats, call them liars, claim dilution based on nothing and then all of those posts get to sit there for potential new investors to read and be turned off by. Then you let those same people posting slander be moderators on a board and allow them to skew the sentiment of the board. so what are you guidelines for appointing someone ass a moderator? BigTimeWinner on the ONCI board is a perfect example. This guy has been bashing the stock, the CEO, claiming unfounded dilution, etc for the last 4 months....he wanted to be able to stickie and stuff BS in peoples faces on the board and so he applies as a moderator and gets appointed by the admins on the site. Not only does he get added by the admins, but another member who is very highly thought of around the Ihub world gets replaced by this guy.
So how does that work? I just want the site to be fair. obviously in the world of social media it is impossible to be able to filter out all of the BS, but when you have someone like that, how can you justify making him a moderator of a board? it isn't like he moderates a bunch of boards, this is now his only one, and the only reason he wanted to be one was to be able to force feed BS to people, because as he has claimed himself on the board many times, he is shorting the stock (which if that is true or not, nobody knows)
