Maybe they are cheats or liars. Or, maybe they are the next Warren Buffet or the greatest thing since sliced bread. Who are we to judge that? Posters express their opinions, readers assess their credibility.
Maybe there will be dilution, maybe not. Who are we to assess that? Besides, in the OTC marketplace dilution is the norm, to say least.
Slander, or more accurately in this context, libel, is a matter of truth. We are not arbiters of truth. Libel is a matter between the allegedly libeled party, the poster and a court of law.
The opinions expressed by users who moderate have no more or less credibility than any other poster. Unless the reader finds them to me more credible. That’s their duty and privilege.
It doesn’t matter in the slightest what users think about other users, including moderators. A moderator’s role is to enforce the TOS. The TOS in neutral toward investment sentiment. So, it matters not at all if they are bulls or bears, opinionated or reserved, liked or disliked.
Force feed? Ignores work on moderators, too. You get to control what you read, not what others post. It sounds to me like you’re hanging on their every word merely because they are a moderator. If you choose to do that, that’s your decision.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
