InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 58
Posts 8395
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/15/2009

Re: whipstick post# 433799

Wednesday, 10/18/2017 12:11:57 PM

Wednesday, October 18, 2017 12:11:57 PM

Post# of 793426
Im talking about fact here...

Throwing out unsubstantiated theories helps no one.

Could it have been a “panicked response”? I suppose.

But its equally possible that he realized he had been taken to mean something he didnt mean and actually wanted to correct. In fact, that is MORE likely given his second sentence you are ignoring during the interview.

And lets be completely honest here. If the words had been reversed, ...if he had said “that is false” during the interview and then followed up the next day with a public statement that eluded to it being true, you and others would be posting about how the first statement was a cover-up and the follow-up statement was his guilt getting the better of him and him wanting to come clean. Anything to fit the narrative.

And lets also assume you are correct...and that the second statement was a cover up. Who do you think told him to cover it up? could it be his boss who doesn’t want the net worth sweep to end? Some ally.

All speculation of course. The only truth we know for sure is that on the night of the interview and in the statement after, Mnuchin seemed to indicate that Fannie and Freddie were not funding the affordable care act.