Wednesday, October 18, 2017 12:11:57 PM
Throwing out unsubstantiated theories helps no one.
Could it have been a “panicked response”? I suppose.
But its equally possible that he realized he had been taken to mean something he didnt mean and actually wanted to correct. In fact, that is MORE likely given his second sentence you are ignoring during the interview.
And lets be completely honest here. If the words had been reversed, ...if he had said “that is false” during the interview and then followed up the next day with a public statement that eluded to it being true, you and others would be posting about how the first statement was a cover-up and the follow-up statement was his guilt getting the better of him and him wanting to come clean. Anything to fit the narrative.
And lets also assume you are correct...and that the second statement was a cover up. Who do you think told him to cover it up? could it be his boss who doesn’t want the net worth sweep to end? Some ally.
All speculation of course. The only truth we know for sure is that on the night of the interview and in the statement after, Mnuchin seemed to indicate that Fannie and Freddie were not funding the affordable care act.
FEATURED Cannabix Technologies Launches New Compact Breath Logix Workplace Series and Prepares for Delivery to South Africa • May 7, 2024 8:51 AM
Moon Equity Holdings, Corp. Announces Acquisition of Wikolo, Inc. • MONI • May 7, 2024 9:48 AM
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM