InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 78
Posts 20939
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/07/2006

Re: es1 post# 123954

Saturday, 06/24/2017 6:32:22 PM

Saturday, June 24, 2017 6:32:22 PM

Post# of 276126
"When the company was asked about metric tons being produced it was denied."

not for a very long time..they let many shareholders (including you) believe they were in fact producing tonnage of ms when they were in fact NOT doing so..

"The company never said they had any tons of anything."

correct...and when I mentioned that back in late 2014, you said kim already stated he would have tonnage by mid 2014..he didn't have to pr that he accomplished it..it should be considered a fait accompli..

"They have told us that the location that the PP was at could produce tons at full capacity."

what pp was this?..is it still producing ms?..

"I have speculated that they should have produced well over a ton over the years but I would say most of it was destroyed as the strains emerged."

utterly meaningless

"I would guess that Kim has quite a bit of MS but it won't be used for samples until the company has an operating farm."

yea...cause if you used it for samples to big companies, that could lead to partnerships and who knows what else...who wants that?..lol

"I don't think that blaming the company because someone was wrong in speculations makes any sense."

he also attributes much of his speculation to info from the company and ben..

"It definitely shouldn't be used as evidence that a company is bad in any way."

well kim sure doesn't need any help in making himself and the company look bad...his shoddy management does it well enough..










Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent KBLB News