InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,222.68
(
0.16%
)
US TECH 100
17,650.00
(
0.05%
)
Dow Jones
39,512.84
(
0.32%
)
Brent Oil
82.59
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
61,159.59
(
0.61%
)
Post# of 96903
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Ultimate Warrior

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 54
Posts 4488
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/18/2009

Ultimate Warrior

Re: KeepItRealistic post# 34813

Friday, 06/23/2017 8:46:21 PM

Friday, June 23, 2017 8:46:21 PM

Post# of 96903
Yes, they are the ones who provided the infringing hardware to the cable companies. Cisco is the nexus of this entire thing, and they will have no choice but to pay handsomely to settle all of this. The easiest route is a settlement and buyout of the patents. Both are necessary because a simple purchase of the patents does not award them ownership of the patents retroactively. Atonement must be made for the violations that have already taken place.

One way around this would be to buy UOIP in its entirety. That will cost a lot more than simply buying the patents, but it would avoid a settlement for past damages since UOIP would belong to Cisco and they wouldn't sue themselves.

The content of my messages are my own opinions and sentiments at the time of posting. My thoughts on a stock may change as new facts and conditions present themselves. No one should base their investing on my opinions. Do your own research and decide i

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up