InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 5005
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/14/2009

Re: ccraider post# 22260

Wednesday, 04/26/2017 9:02:16 AM

Wednesday, April 26, 2017 9:02:16 AM

Post# of 23258
ORDER REOPENING CASES AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 4-14-17

http://photos.imageevent.com/banos/ndocreopen/ORDER%20REOPENING%20CASES%20AND%20SETTING%20CASE%20MANAGEMENT%20CONFERENCE%204-14-17.pdf

Courtesy of "BaNosser".

I believe PTSC had to wait for the procedural steps of the appeals court handing the case back to the district court and the district court reopening the case which are formalities they have to do regardless of the merits of the case. This is PTSCs first opportunity to throw in the towel and the court says:

"If the parties continue to believe that the accused products do not infringe under the operative claim construction, they may renew their stipulation to a judgment of noninfringement
in lieu of filing separate case management statements.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 14, 2017"

Since the appeals court judges have said they believe the minor change in claims construction will not change the outcome of the case I expect PTSC or the defendants to renew their stipulation to a judgement of noninfringement.

If PTSC does not do so I expect this judge to agree with the defendants stipulation to non infringement as this was the judge that signed off on the initial claims construction which ended PTSCs chances of winning. In my opinion its over and this is simply a formality.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CPMV News