Replies to post #22261 on Mosaic ImmunoEngineering Inc (CPMV)

[ccraider]

...because the parties stipulated (from the Appeals Court Ruling)...
Although this minor modification to the district court’s construction likely does not affect the outcome in this case, because the parties stipulated to non-infringement under the district court’s construction, the proper course of action is for us to vacate and remand.

For the Tec´s here is the Grewal CC:
http://photos.imageevent.com/banos/ndoc6/CLAIM%20CONSTRUCTION%20REPORT%20AND%20RECOMMENDATION%209-22-15.pd
“an [oscillator] located entirely on the same semiconductor substrate as the [central processing unit] that does not require a control signal and whose frequency is not fixed by any external crystal.”

And here ist the Appeals Court ruling:
http://agoracom.com/ir/patriot/forums/discussion/topics/686798-ndoc-appeal-pacer-opinion-filed-and-judgment-entered-03-03-2017/messages/2140733#message
“an oscillator located entirely on the same semiconductor substrate as the central processing unit that does not require a command input to change the clock frequency and whose frequency is not fixed by any external crystal.”

As a foreigner, that does not sound like a minor change, anyone?