"If that's truly all they had to offer I wouldn't expect the Motion to succeed."
I just read the TAUG motion and the Defendant's response. $5 poorer but still of the same opinion.
It pretty much is all TAUG had to offer (they "inadvertently" failed to make the jury demand on a timely basis in accordance with the rule) and they aren't likely to have their motion granted.
A waste of everyone's time and I still don't understand why the Judge would allow oral arguments.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.