InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 1387
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/09/2010

Re: es1 post# 116260

Thursday, 01/19/2017 6:39:18 PM

Thursday, January 19, 2017 6:39:18 PM

Post# of 276229

We don't need to disagree. I am 100% sure that had Kim partnered with Mark Zuckerberg and his $50b we would be in full production. But none of us would be here. We wouldn't be in production They would be with Zuckerberg silk Co and VP of science Kim.



It isn't money. It's about bringing something to the world



You're idealism is showing. I'm going to continue to agree to disagree. You want it both ways and you can't argue against logic.

What we both want is a higher PPS. I hope we see it sooner rather than later. I don't have all the time in the world, and I'm not Johnny-come-Lately showing up for the short play. I've put my time in, just like many others here. And I've been assured by the CEO of a publicly traded company that commercialization is right around the corner. Unlike you, no part of me is a sucker for Kim's cute games. It's irritating and insulting to me to communicate the way he does. I'm here for the science, and Kim was the starter and hasn't yet proven himself to be a finisher. Time will tell.

Peace.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent KBLB News