InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 147209
Next 10
Followers 34
Posts 2522
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/28/2001

Re: Prudent Capitalist post# 123601

Wednesday, 12/07/2016 2:21:24 PM

Wednesday, December 07, 2016 2:21:24 PM

Post# of 147209
You're doing a service by clarifying that the decision of the Supreme Court was on the proper measures of damages, not on liability. They did not let Samsung off the hook for infringing on Apple's design patent. They sent the case back to the court below for re-assessment of the damage award. But as long as you're at it, why not clarify as well that what Samsung is liable for is infringing, not "stealing and infringing."




.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AAPL News