InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 112
Posts 10856
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/01/2009

Re: Johnny_C post# 34819

Monday, 11/28/2016 9:34:39 AM

Monday, November 28, 2016 9:34:39 AM

Post# of 54031
It is ROTF worthy that so much is made of this phrase
both here and on that ridiculous site

You do remember the judge TRANSFER the case in the interest of justice.


I do not think it means what it is touted as meaning.

LMAO

Here is the statement made in its original context...
"CONCLUSION
When an action is commenced in an improper venue, this Court must dismiss the action,
or in the interest of justice, transfer the matter to a district in which the action could have
properly been brought. 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). Here, all Defendants reside in New Jersey and a
substantial part of all of the events or omissions giving rise to the Tauriga’s claims occurred in
New Jersey. Venue is therefore proper in the District of New Jersey.
For all of the foregoing reasons, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that
Defendants’ Motion to Transfer Venue [DE 23] is GRANTED and Defendants’ Motion to
Case 3:16-cv-06285-PGS-DEA Document 49 Filed 09/30/16 Page 6 of 7 PageID: 497
7
Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) [DE 23] is DENIED AS MOOT.
The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to TRANSFER this case to the United States District
Court for the District of New Jersey and CLOSE THIS CASE."

Some may also remember that the Motion was to Dismiss OR Transfer...

Hence...
"ORDER granting 23 Motion to Transfer Venue, denying as moot Motion to Dismiss."

TIC TOC WHAT TO DO???
ROTFLMAO