InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 511
Posts 59409
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 12/21/2009

Re: Suszko post# 48959

Friday, 10/21/2016 9:54:29 PM

Friday, October 21, 2016 9:54:29 PM

Post# of 75082
One is Brendan Burke. I saw his "posts"......

from 2014 where he said Kyle LIED. He also said he was a lender and I recall Huffman saying that or filed that because he wanted money for preparing for the Burke deposition.

The other lender who's name I do not know has stated his/her involvement. But here is where he/she says Kyle LIED. Remember this is the 2014 permit.

According to Kyle last week, this gives them permission for FULL recovery WITH the company KEEPING 80% of the stuff found. It is worded weird, but he said this is a new way of saying it and there will be no need for another permit.



http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=104768992

Now anyone that read Mary's depo and is familiar with Florida statutes knows there are still only 2 types of permits and SFRX still had to apply AND OBTAIN a recovery permit in order to keep 80%.

Now Burke flat out says Kyle LIED. The other lender didn't use that term, but he obviously fell for the LIE if in fact Kyle said what he claimed.

I hope this helped.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SFRX News