InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 251721
Next 10
Followers 6
Posts 1203
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/09/2006

Re: DewDiligence post# 204612

Monday, 09/26/2016 10:32:12 AM

Monday, September 26, 2016 10:32:12 AM

Post# of 251721
The premise would be that each drug would be spun off into its own independent unit once it was commercially established.

So let's say (NB--not my actual opinions) I think that BIIB's Tecfidera is a great MS compound and the PML risk is over-blown.

But let's also say:

1. I think BIIB's other MS drugs are likely average;
2. I just don't know anything about hemophilia; and
3. I look at BIIB's pipeline and think they are all over the place with IBS, ALS, Alz, etc.

If BIIB just spun off a single company that owned and sold each of its approved therapies, I could invest in Tecfidera Co. with its sales stream and regular dividend without being "forced" to buy into hemophilia and discovery ops that I don't know or like.

If you could cherry pick your favorite therapies apart from the companies that launched/control them, what would your choices be?

If you could invest in a company's discovery and pipeline without having to worry about whether they can run a sales force, who would you pick?

IMO, pharma today is a bit like the 80s conglomerates -- they think they're creating value by building pre-packaged diversification, but investors aren't the real beneficiaries of that strategy.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.