I thoroughly appreciate YOUR efforts to bring clarity to this board.
My only wish is that PFIE deserved it. Those statements attributable to PFIE were written FOR but not necessarily BY an in-house Investor Relations person. It's cheaper to maintain a contract with an outside agency. In other words, a professional writer is engaged to take information, however sparse it may be, and effectively wield it into an imaginative piece designed to stimulate interest which, hopefully, will turn into a buyer's lust. I just love the reference to shareholder value---where'd that concern show up since the glory days? And how have shareholders been rewarded?
It is crazy in the minds of most professionals to sit around idly, reminiscing about the good old days when valuations were six times that of today. There is no future in the past, simple as that.
By the way, the company first came about in the first half of 2007. Its all time high was $4.83 back in 2014. This info is a far cry from the $6 number proffered.
Something any reputable analyst will consider is this:
Over what span of time has the company occupied its highs and lows? How recently was either extreme experienced? How much time was spent in the higher range as opposed to the lower?
PFIE's history has been nothing short of desperate, empty words with little to no tangible result in evidence today. With its nine year history showing no reasons for trusting there'll be a turn-around inasmuch as there's never been one (!)in its history---how can anyone insist EVERYTHING is going to suddenly change because of "a feeling?" And what might cause that change to reverse nine years of horribly lackluster performance, bringing things into positive territory?
This stock isn't going anywhere worthwhile because it hasn't been able to prove it has value. It's all empty words fashioned in such a way as to make it look like more than the pig's ear that it is.
Pardon my venom but I despise companies pitching their stock trying to convince investors by means of unproven intent rather than making actionable moves for the sake of the company first, with shareholders being the direct beneficiary---second.
