Followers | 10 |
Posts | 2477 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 04/02/2015 |
Friday, April 29, 2016 12:14:03 AM
Yes I believe it required the action of a majority of the shares outstanding to secure the assets like that. After taking over the code license he was required to notify the Iterated successor but their approval was not required just their notification. Copies of that notification are in the public filings I have seen on the Dimension web site. There may have been some discussion between them at that point but I have no idea what it was. It doesnt sound like there was a problem.
However after knowingly buying the stolen copy of the codec from Simpson and Haskins TMM also knowingly failed to notify the Iterated successor. They clearly knew what would happen then.
FEATURED Cannabix Technologies Launches New Compact Breath Logix Workplace Series and Prepares for Delivery to South Africa • May 7, 2024 8:51 AM
Moon Equity Holdings, Corp. Announces Acquisition of Wikolo, Inc. • MONI • May 7, 2024 9:48 AM
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM