InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 93
Posts 21466
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/07/2011

Re: Bansky post# 98951

Thursday, 02/04/2016 9:28:49 AM

Thursday, February 04, 2016 9:28:49 AM

Post# of 112299
OK. The executives of that company are not the company

And neither do you give stock to a rusty terminal as in "facility".

but you have misquoted the managements statement below...



Would you care to give an example of a quote given in my post which was not accurate? It isn't that complicated to do a cut&paste from the mystery Email, and then hit the quote button on the left side. There was nothing misquoted.

It explicitly states ".....were issued to us or anyone we know...".



Wow. So if JFK Terminal explicitly states something, then it must be true. Just like all the nonsense they explicitly stated about recycled frac water?

Any statements as to JFK or any of their associates ever owning shares in BAYP are now shown to be not true.



Any statements made to prove JFK and associates do not have BAYP stock, have fallen short, and can not be verified. We do know the JFK JV with BAYP pump time frame corresponded to 195M shares being issued. We know the pumps were total nonsense. And 1 yr later nothing has happened. We know BAYP doesn't dare file a Form 10 with an embedded audit. As they would have to account for stock ownership. Convenient they don't report to the SEC isn't it?

The Jewel of the Mind is Colored with the Hue of what it Imagines