Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. (fka SPNGQ)

[cowtown jay]

I think that when a company continues to be illegally shorted, even while it is on the RegSHO list, that it is only just that shareholders be richly rewarded when the illegal short sellers are forced to cover.

As I posted on the KBIO board, "KBIO shareholders have been fortunate. But in my opinion, I think it would be naive to believe that you are isolated from being victimized by a short selling campaign, regardless of how many shares the Shkreli group holds, and regardless of what the law is. But I am very happy for all of you."

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=118909478

Funny thing, isn't it, that the DTC would temporarily lift the global trading lock on SpongeTech shares, to cover Aged Fails, at exactly the time that the initial estate representative was appointed, and granted subpoena power to obtain the company's NOBO and OBO share data?

Or that Penson would file bankruptcy just days before I was appointed as the successor estate representative, and granted subpoena power to obtain their Blue Sheet trading records?

So as you can see, such as from what I posted on the KBIO board, my interest is not in dumping over-priced SpongeTech shares onto other shareholders. My interest is in selling those shares, at the highest possible price, to the market participants who illegally sold those shares to me in the first place.