InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 136
Posts 9915
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/20/2013

Re: Gcasa post# 27433

Friday, 11/20/2015 3:22:02 PM

Friday, November 20, 2015 3:22:02 PM

Post# of 49996
The company attorney alleged in his summation that there'd been no dividend shares issued. It's there to be read by one and all. Concern for questionable facts placed in evidence by the filing company's corporate attorney cannot possibly be categorized as fodder for a "nitpicky" shareholder, which I am.

But my point is that I suspect there's a potential for fraud within the paragraphs, whether by deliberate action to conceal or just plain carelessness---or, as I suspect is likely the case---determined exclusion of pertinent factual information by somebody in management. If management failed to provide the lawyer with critical information, then...,of course, the attorney is off the hook. Early on in the document Mr. Cook, Esq., states something to the effect that he's going on the strength of information provided him by management.

To me, that is a disclaimer of sorts.

The above reflects my ideas and concerns only and is not intended to represent anything otherwise. These are certainly legitimate concerns to be discussed on this board as they should be front and center concerns for all USEI shareholders.