InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 53
Posts 2168
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/15/2014

Re: richbob post# 4845

Thursday, 09/03/2015 12:44:46 PM

Thursday, September 03, 2015 12:44:46 PM

Post# of 6407
I think the DOE will have to reconsider their grant with BFRE. Especially if we have financing from Trump endorsed delegates to the department. This is low hanging fruit that the chief is going to want to keep. To have tossed the company's grant aside based on one technology stale out without realizing that the grant was for a plethora of other ideas and shareholder driven initiatives on a magnitude of order seventy times larger than just the US DOE. The Agriculture Department, the grass roots farmers of America, the Labor Department and targeted Agriculture and Labor grants in California, New Jersey, Arkansas, and China.

Eventually the managers of BFRE and the torch holders of the old guard are going to have to pass the torch. The notion of tossing away tons of biomass that California and Colorado have produced in their medical marijuana industry in combined tandem operation with mineral and gemstone mining with a triumvirate operation model that generates profitable revenue from ONE SINGLE LOCATION using:

1) medical marijuana and recreational cannabis production
2) gemstone and AU/AG mining on the same location as #1
3) biomass production for Bluefire Renewable ethanol production

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.