InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 253169
Next 10
Followers 47
Posts 4694
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/19/2006

Re: jbog post# 191727

Wednesday, 05/27/2015 12:00:20 PM

Wednesday, May 27, 2015 12:00:20 PM

Post# of 253169
From the release it sounds like the first trial only enrolled non-ciorrhotics w high baseline VL, so the 95% SVR has to be taken in that context. Not sure about the randomized portion, but the 98% here helps compete w GILD (GILD had 100% SVR in a somewhat smaller trial)
I don't think the cirrhotic data is competitive w GILD though
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.