InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 1190
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/25/2014

Re: Kmeister post# 147739

Thursday, 05/21/2015 6:35:05 PM

Thursday, May 21, 2015 6:35:05 PM

Post# of 165855
No one except Dan knows why he took on the responsibilities of being a Officer / Director of a Public Entity except Dan himself. It is just as likely that he took it on because he needed to find a way to replace the 250K due and owing to the Retirement Fund opposed to "Nobody Else" was doing it. Another option is that it was a means to obtaining a future Financial gain either by way of stock options or salary or both.

I don t know but to say he took it on solely because "nobody else" would is in itself not accurate. There are numerous non altruistic reasons for his involvement with Sarissa.

IMO Scott can t be "fired" unless he wants to go. Most importantly he is the controlling individual with Sarissa and secondly the Company owes him, or Entity s he controls, a great deal of money.

As for a qualified / experienced CEO who would, with that type of resume, realistically consider it?