Thursday, May 21, 2015 6:09:37 PM
I don't think it is necessary to replace Dan. I think it is necessary to have someone help him. Remember, Dan is not doing this because he is super qualified. Dan is doing this because NOBODY ELSE was. He rightly knew that someone had to put a boot in Scotts ass or we were going nowhere.
Its interesting that you use the term "the right name". Scott has the right name, he just happens to be a dud. I don't know the movers and shakers of the mining industry so I would not recognize "the name" of a qualified CEO.
I would be impressed with rapid positive progress. Whoever can get that done has my vote.
Does that answer your question?
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM