Friday, May 01, 2015 11:01:45 AM
We have all heard this. But as far as I know nobody has ever produced anything that verified it.
IMO it makes no sense at all that a company is a "reporting issuer" because the IR is in a province. I realize that regulations are stupid sometimes and that this could be correct but I have never seen anything from an authority that says this.
But we should find out easy enough next week.
If the IR needs to be gone for a year we should have the CTO gone in a few days.
If the CTO isn't gone by the end of the month I would guess that the 1 year IR thing is just another rumor passed along for years without thought to if it was actually true.
It will be nice to see something simple happen here for once instead of thinking something should be simple only to find out there are a dozen other things that need to happen first.
Also on a different topic wasn't the 43-101 supposed to cover ALL work done up to current drilling?
Why is there no mention of the SOE testing and the Huston lab work?
Is the "ALL" actually "Almost" or are they required to list the work no matter what?
Lingerie Fighting Championships Signs Broadcast Deal With Maybacks Global Entertainment • BOTY • Sep 26, 2024 9:00 AM
Maybacks Global Entertainment and Lingerie Fighting Championships Enter Into Broadcast And Revenue Sharing Agreement • AHRO • Sep 26, 2024 8:30 AM
North Bay Resources Commences Operations at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California; Engages Sabean Group Management Consulting • NBRI • Sep 25, 2024 9:15 AM
CEO David B. Dorwart Anticipates a Bright Future at Good Gaming Inc. Through His Most Recent Shareholder Update • GMER • Sep 25, 2024 8:30 AM
Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. Advance Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology - Dr. Bruce Goldberger to Present at Society of Forensic Toxicologists Conference • BLOZF • Sep 24, 2024 8:50 AM
Integrated Ventures, Inc Announces Strategic Partnership For GLP-1 (Semaglutide) Procurement Through MedWell USA, LLC. • INTV • Sep 24, 2024 8:45 AM