InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 161
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/07/2014

Re: brentkosta post# 14425

Wednesday, 03/18/2015 10:39:15 AM

Wednesday, March 18, 2015 10:39:15 AM

Post# of 29174
Good response to a partially disgruntled Shareholder at the moment!
Yes, licenses were handed out on whatever selection basis HC chose. Sometimes bad things happen to good companies and in this case I think Supreme has foes somewhere in the Canadian political system. I never meant to insinuate that Supreme should notify shareholders that HC is rolling in tomorrow for inspection. What I would like to see is immediate notification to shareholders that inspection is complete and were waiting on results. MMPR to anyone that's not abusing the MM system is a plague point blank. Those turning homes into grow houses that are producing enough pot for an army should be disarmed. The whole premise for this injunction was to sort through the legitimacy of MM patients vs the scumbags growing for unintended purposes. How that's finalized in this case is to me the lifeline of those scrambling to get a license. If modifications to MMPR in any way also support MMAR and home growers then I see hiccups coming. Those who cannot afford the necessary doses for their ailments could be allowed to continue and any new prescriptions could require patients to choose a distributor. Who really knows. What's important is this case reaching a decision this month and no further delays, oh and a favorable MMPR one at that or like you said "IT"S OVER"!

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.