Saturday, December 20, 2014 8:23:04 PM
Cotton wrote;
This was in response to securities law claims, or in other words, claims for damages that JPM may have suffered due to a security law breach whereas JPM was an underwriter. Exhibit C lists all securities that JPM was an underwriter along with others, and the CTs were among them. This was a blanket claim basically saying that if a securities law was broken, and a claim was made against JPM that they may come back and place a claim against LBHI for recovery. That is why it says; "The name of each such creditor is not currently known."
To date we have not see any motion or docket that indicates such a claim. For this to be "applicable" JPM must have made a securities law violation under the scope as an underwriter to the CTs and have been charged with such and claim made. That has not happened. So, this theory of JPM being a co-debtor has been misconstrued. Just because cotton sees the word "co-debtor" in their claim against the Lehman estate does not mean they are a co-debtor.
Lingerie Fighting Championships Signs Broadcast Deal With Maybacks Global Entertainment • BOTY • Sep 26, 2024 9:00 AM
Maybacks Global Entertainment and Lingerie Fighting Championships Enter Into Broadcast And Revenue Sharing Agreement • AHRO • Sep 26, 2024 8:30 AM
North Bay Resources Commences Operations at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California; Engages Sabean Group Management Consulting • NBRI • Sep 25, 2024 9:15 AM
CEO David B. Dorwart Anticipates a Bright Future at Good Gaming Inc. Through His Most Recent Shareholder Update • GMER • Sep 25, 2024 8:30 AM
Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. Advance Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology - Dr. Bruce Goldberger to Present at Society of Forensic Toxicologists Conference • BLOZF • Sep 24, 2024 8:50 AM
Integrated Ventures, Inc Announces Strategic Partnership For GLP-1 (Semaglutide) Procurement Through MedWell USA, LLC. • INTV • Sep 24, 2024 8:45 AM