>> Since he also doesn’t provide the calculations
He did, you just don't understand it.
>> I still find it hard to understand why you guys are taking him as seriously as you are.
Same here, I still don't understand why anyone would want to bury his head in sand, refuse to see any other valid point of view. It never turns out well in biotech in the long run. I guess it is just easier for many people to accept either everything is great or everything is terrible!
>> His suggestion that iNHL & MCL should show greater activity (both of which show a significant amount, though only 1PR) also isn’t compelling, because we have no information on how long these pts have been treated at this dose level, and therefore, no basis on which to judge how those responses compare to Idel. & IPI-145.
Oh, now you say there isn't enough information to say one way or the other? I thought it was already decided best in class already!
