Biotech Values

[bellweather1]

RE:TGTX/CRG(Jason Chew note)

So it does appear to me he could be talking his book a bit here.

With all due respect, when a commentator(and self suggested biotech expert) alters data slides, fails to reference the source of those slides, suggests that his calculations,(never provided),completely refute what are really fairly measured projections by TGTX concerning probable exposure levels in a dose escalation trial,

and then, on that totally flimsy,(and obviously poorly researched) basis, goes on to suggest "fraud",

I'd say characterizing that as "just talking his book a bit" is an enormous understatement.

The only thing I see that's fraudulent here, is his basic MO.

As a result, I think expending too much energy trying to identify why his assertions may be in some way appropriate or founded in fact only legitimizes them to a much greater degree than these deserve.

Of course, just my opinion.

Regards,

bw