Saturday, October 18, 2014 1:44:14 AM
1) large sums involved
2) Boies
3) Chen dissenting
4) amicus briefs (likely)
5) strong submission/key legal issue
6) SCOTUS hearings about similar case are informative/give guidance to CAFC
against us:
1) non-precidential
Hence, considering that many cases that do not get heard en banc may be ones that do have minor sums involved, where the jury was unanimous etc etc, the statistical probability of the Vringo case being heard should be significantly higher. I cannot give a number without collecting detailed data and running corresponding regressions, yet my gut feeling says that the odds should be pretty good given the above case characteristics. Would be curious to hear your thoughts
cheers M
FEATURED Cannabix's Breath Logix Alcohol Device Delivers Positive Impact to Private Monitoring Agency in Montana, USA • Apr 25, 2024 8:52 AM
Bantec Reports an Over 50 Percent Increase in Sales and Profits in Q1 2024 from Q1 2023 • BANT • Apr 25, 2024 10:00 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Announces Name Change to NuVibe, Inc. and Initiation of Ticker Symbol Application Process • KGKG • Apr 25, 2024 8:30 AM
Axis Technologies Group and Carbonis Forge Ahead with New Digital Carbon Credit Technology • AXTG • Apr 24, 2024 3:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Equipment Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Apr 23, 2024 9:41 AM
Epazz, Inc.: CryObo, Inc. solar Bitcoin operations will issue tokens • EPAZ • Apr 23, 2024 9:20 AM