InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 1988
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/21/2013

Re: None

Friday, 09/19/2014 12:43:13 PM

Friday, September 19, 2014 12:43:13 PM

Post# of 38777
As I've previously explained far too many times to count, this "merger document" your entire case is counting on is a total non-issue.

First, its 10+ years past the statute of limitations to challenge it. Yes, the judge inexplicably put it off and said let the jury declare it instead of her but have no doubt they will do just that.

Second, there actually is a merger document. Just ask Simpson, he talks about it in numerous statements, emails and letters. Maybe somebody will post it for you and make you happy, we'll see.

Third, have a chat with any decent lawyer and they will explain to you that the fact ALL the shareholders were moved from one company to a new entity and having all the old shares cancelled and new ones issued makes it a done deal, the assets went too. Look up the legal term estoppel.

Fourth, the original licensing deal between DFI and Iterated was never completed since DFI could not issue 5% of its stock, making the DFMI license with Iterated the first legitimate licensing deal for the codec.

Fifth, the tax attorney for DFI, DFMI and Simpson filed the year 2000 taxes and confirmed DFI was an empty shell with no assets, no shares, no shareholders and that everything and everybody was in DFMI.

Sixth, see any of the hundreds of emails, documents and videos on file at the courthouse that show Simpson, Haskins and everybody else involved back in 2000-2001 confirming the assets were in DFMI. Including Fernandez and tmm on it's web site.

Seventh, Do we really need any more? I could go on forever. Give it up, you lose!