Followers | 5 |
Posts | 91 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 07/09/2013 |
Thursday, July 31, 2014 10:40:20 AM
BUT - my statement relies on hearsay that DPBE truly had an actual treasure recovery contract awarding them 50% of the treasure recovered.
In my DD one government official declined to answer my question about the terms of the "contract", and another stated that they had a letter authorizing them to dive, but no mention of a split of the artifacts was in that letter and the letter was not a binding legal agreement. It was a letter authorizing diving and artifact recovery in case the crew was stopped by a law enforcement officer.
If DPBE dove without a salvage agreement legally giving them 50%, that's their own stupidity. I believe this is the only reason DPBE hasn't filed suit, other companies down there have filed huge lawsuits, but DPBE stands quietly by on the sidelines. I wonder why?
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM