MH I'm afraid I have to agree with you in terms of the significance of the shareholders letter. First and foremost we have everything or nothing based on getting the science independently tested and proven. The stock is where it is because we have not yet met that goal.
I love how all the ducks are being set in a row, once/if we can DO the GOO. Any company that can resolve this longtime objective, will in short time be able to get the interest in all of the areas laid out in his letter.
The letter shows how much better the infrastructure is vs. a couple of years ago, which shows that we have the right management team leading us. But nothing matters until the scientists can solve this problem. The most important thing for me is that they have enough money to continue this fight.
I would like to see us spend most of it, hiring the brightest minds in this specific field, from academia and the public/private sectors. If there is anyone out there that is equal or better than the great minds we have working for us in the labs, let's double their salaries or give them much stock options to come join our side expediting this scientific dilemma.
If we can do it, we will be in a position to buy other companies with shared synergies etc. If there is enough room in the labs and we have enough financial inducements to bring in more scientist let's do it. As we have been reading here, the multi-billion dollars corporations are all realizing where the future of the industry and economy lies. Do you think that they are now throwing tons of assets trying to catch up with ours and others science? Whomever crosses the line first in this race will be king.
All the other chatter on this MB about anything else than the science about how to get the stock price higher is misguided in my opinion, as the ONLY thing that counts is the science
