Winning Brands Corporation (WNBD)

[hopetocashin]

I was asked to invest $25,000 with Southridge back in August of 2013. I decided not to invest for a number of reasons. This was an email I received on 8/21/13 explaining the benefits of making such an investment. Once again, I do not post this out of anger or resentment, but rather, to give those investing now every bit of information they may need to do their own DD. In another email I was told, if I would have invested I was guaranteed a non-diluting percentage of the company:

I had a productive, practical working session with Southridge. There is no harebrained scheme that we have to rely on. The reason that this will work out is very practical – it is in everybody’s interest.



· Southridge has a track record of obtaining court approval to receive free trading shares to settle legitimate debt. They want this so that they can make money on the transactions, with the shares, by having a built-in profit to handle the matter.

· Your debt is legitimate because money is changing hands – we are not cooking something up with fake entries.

· The law permits us to recognize the risk that you are taking with a return that is high. Venture capitalists do this all the time. You are now graduating to being a “Venture Capitalist”, thus getting higher return.

· The law permits us to provide you, as a creditor, with recognition that is different than to regular shareholders who are not creditors. They had their chance. My weblog provides a level playing field by making the invitation. No one can complain afterward.

· Your intervention now, with the $25,000 has a disproportionately positive impact on the company by breaking a log jam in the processing of back orders ($130,000 as of today). This is good for our shareholders in general. It may help us to prevent delisting. This intervention deserves recognition that is commensurate with the contribution that it makes to the company.



Bottom line: You had initiative on a big scale when you invested originally. Throughout the several years you have observed me in action, and corresponded, and received answers to your questions when I had nothing to gain from doing so. Now when the company is at a special “crux” moment, I am sharing a solution that is mutually beneficial, and ensuring that your reward is not merely a token gesture but something significant.



In this scenario, there are only beneficiaries because no one is being taken advantage of. There is a distribution of rewards according to risk, and a management of that risk through proper planning. There is no reason for failure because the government explicitly permits and encourages this step (by recognizing the authority of a certain level of competent judge) to grant the fairness ruling and facilitating the settlement of debt.