DEAR CASEYTRADER, CHAYA AND OTHERS, POST# 4885 et al to # 4888,
Very nicely agued casey t. Your maintenance of faith and that of others is laudable and is supported by me. Yet aren't there a few other matters worthy of consideration and which are fair now for investors to be questioning. ("Fair" may be reasonable if to some not always wise.)
Yes, I don't for a moment doubt that Chaya works hard and has spoken with all those who may be interested in her device/s. Yet the question, which others have raised, remains : why, if the devices are so worthy, is it proving so difficult to raise finance ? For more than a dozen years we are told of meetings with Govt. Departments, influential brokers, bankers, recently an airline is mentioned and now with Wall Street, all, with the exception of Wall Street, to no avail. Why IS it that all these people and their organisations haven't joined us, her investors, in laying some money down? There is something very peculiar here. Has she been driving over-hard bargains or has she jibbed too far when asked to give up some control ?
Finance is, as ever, a fundamental and yet with these unique devices ready to be made the pattern of promise rises and falls today as it has done for so many years. And do we really think that the pro and con debate of this Board affects seriously share prices. If we all say nothing, are silent, will the share price rise all the way from .15 to .20 and then take off to ...... ? I think not. For those of us who bought at $1.00 and more so long ago a 5 cent rise and fall has almost no meaning other than to raise questions of a very peculiar situation.
Now, Chaya, how about adding some meat-of-fact to the flummery you've been doling out ? How about getting fair dinkum with your investors who bought from the Company, not the market and all else besides ? We know you know what fair dinkum means, so how about, eh ?
Shiner.
